Discovering The Truth About

The Mcdonalds Coffee Lawsuit Fact And Fiction

The judicial process is always fair and that is why it has been strengthened overtime. People bring the court cases to get a good verdict from the courts and they tend to handle all the types of cases that there are. One case type that is really delicate is the personal injury ones and that is because they involve the personal injury. There are really no fixed penalties and most of the people tend to feel if they lose the case that the verdict was unfair. Most of the cases happen to be forgotten but one that the people were able to talk about most involves a coffee company. A lady that was made rich through compensation in a coffee lawsuit is what people have been hearing in the news or reading.

The lady who got compensated was burnt by the coffee when the coffee spilt on her lap and she filed a court case. Sources tell that she was holding the coffee with her laps while she drove and that compensation was unfair. However, before judging, we should be able to get the facts of the whole case right and why the company chose to pay.

One of the facts that there is in this case is the other complaints that they had received from other clients about the same burns from their coffee. With all of these personal injury claims against them, the chances of the company to get a win were slim because it is not just about the clients negligence but also the problem was with their coffee.

The company admitted that their coffee was too hot The coffee that they served was at 180 degrees and the standard in the market was 135 degrees and that meant that it was too hot. For the company, admitting liability made it hard for them and that is because such heat is known to cause deep burns.

The client should also be able to consider the fact that the lady was able to get some serious burns. The lady was hurt enough and the evidence is because there are medical records that show she was admitted and received medication for some time.

The other fact that should not be sidelined is the fact that the lady was old and was with her grandson at the time of the accident. The lady was not middle aged and was in her old age and that is not what a lot of people knew. The driver was the grandson as contrary to the beliefs that people have. The arguing of the personal injury lawyer was good because they were professionals and that is why they won the case.